The Importance of Separation of Duties for Small Contractors 

Separation of Duties (SoD) is a fundamental concept in cybersecurity that plays a vital role in protecting businesses of all sizes. By ensuring that no single individual has control over all key aspects of a system, SoD minimizes the risk of errors, fraud, and security breaches. This principle is particularly vital for defense contractors and businesses handling sensitive data, as maintaining proper SoD helps meet compliance requirements, such as the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). 

For small contractors, implementing SoD can be challenging due to limited IT staff. With fewer employees available to manage various responsibilities, roles often overlap, making it challenging to separate essential tasks effectively. However, failing to establish proper SoD can lead to severe consequences, such as insider threats, unauthorized access, and non-compliance penalties. For small contractors working within the Defense Industrial Base, achieving compliance with regulations like CMMC and DFARS is vital to maintaining government contracts and protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). 

Addressing these challenges and adopting SoD best practices, even small contractors can reduce risks, maintain compliance, and safeguard their businesses against insider threats and cybersecurity breaches. 

Understanding Separation of Duties in Cybersecurity 

Separation of Duties is a key principle in cybersecurity that involves dividing essential tasks among different individuals or teams to minimize the risk of malicious activity, errors, or fraud. By ensuring that no single person has full control over sensitive operations, SoD creates a system of checks and balances that enhances organizational security.

In practice, this could mean separating tasks such as system administration, access control, and log monitoring to prevent any one individual from exploiting or compromising a system. 

The importance of SoD extends beyond preventing intentional fraud; it also helps to reduce human errors, which can be just as damaging. When duties are distributed among multiple personnel, it becomes easier to identify mistakes and address them before they escalate into serious issues. This structure is vital in preventing conflicts of interest and ensuring that security processes are handled with transparency and accountability. SoD is especially relevant for businesses working in regulated industries, such as defense contracting. Compliance frameworks like CMMC, DFARS, and NIST 800-171 mandate the implementation of SoD to protect sensitive data and CUI). By adhering to these standards, organizations can strengthen their cybersecurity posture and ensure they remain in compliance with regulatory requirements, avoiding costly penalties and protecting their eligibility for government contracts. 

Key Duties to Separate, Regardless of Company Size 

No matter the size of your company, certain key duties must always be separated to maintain a strong cybersecurity posture and prevent risks like insider threats, fraud, and non-compliance. The following areas are important for ensuring proper Separation of Duties in any business, including small contractors with limited IT staff. 

1. Access Management vs. Privileged User Monitoring

One of the most important areas to separate is access management (who can access systems and data) from privileged user monitoring (who oversees those with elevated permissions). Access management typically involves assigning roles and permissions, while privileged user monitoring ensures that administrators and other high-level users cannot exploit their elevated privileges. Without this separation, privileged users could bypass security controls and access sensitive information without detection. 

2. System Administration vs. Security Monitoring

Another vital separation is between system administration (the team responsible for maintaining and operating the IT infrastructure) and security monitoring (the team that detects and responds to security incidents). Allowing system administrators to handle both tasks can lead to conflicts of interest and prevent impartial oversight. By dividing these roles, businesses ensure that system changes and potential security incidents are continuously reviewed and addressed by independent parties. 

3. Change Management vs. Approval/Review

Businesses must separate change management (making system updates or changes) from the approval and review process. This division ensures that any updates to key systems, such as patches or configuration changes, are reviewed and approved by a separate entity before implementation. Failing to do so can introduce vulnerabilities that go unnoticed or create opportunities for malicious insiders to hide changes that compromise security. 

When these duties are not properly separated, businesses are vulnerable to significant risks, such as unauthorized access, unapproved changes, and undetected security breaches. Without clear separation, a single employee or insider can gain too much control over critical systems, leading to potentially disastrous consequences. Let’s explore these risks with real-world examples:

1. Unauthorized Access: In a scenario where the same individual is responsible for both requesting and approving access to sensitive systems, there is a risk of granting unauthorized access. For example, an IT administrator with full control over user accounts and access controls could create a backdoor account or elevate their own permissions without oversight. This could allow them to access confidential company data, such as financial records or intellectual property, without detection. A notable case occurred when a disgruntled employee at a healthcare organization exploited their excessive access to steal patient data, leading to significant legal and financial consequences for the company.  

2. Unapproved Changes: If an employee responsible for making changes to financial records or software code is also responsible for approving those changes, there is a heightened risk of unapproved or malicious modifications. For instance, in the banking industry, an employee could alter financial transactions or records to cover up fraudulent activity or embezzlement. In 2016, a case involving a tech company illustrated this risk when a system administrator was able to modify system settings without proper checks, resulting in months of undetected fraudulent activity that cost the company millions. 

3. Undetected Security Breaches: When one person has control over both security monitoring and response, there’s a risk that breaches may go undetected. For example, if a network administrator is responsible for monitoring logs and also has access to critical systems, they could delete logs or disable security alerts to cover up a breach. In the infamous Target data breach of 2013, hackers exploited a lack of oversight by gaining access to the retailer’s network and were able to steal millions of customer records without being detected for an extended period. Proper Separation of Duties (SoD) could have helped detect suspicious activity earlier. 

By separating duties, such as splitting the roles of approving access, implementing changes, and monitoring security, businesses reduce the risk of insider threats and ensure that multiple people are involved in sensitive processes. This adds necessary checks and balances, reducing the potential for unchecked actions that could harm the organization. 

Challenges Faced by Small Contractors in Implementing Separation of Duties 

For small contractors, implementing effective SoD can be a significant challenge due to limited resources. In larger organizations, it's easier to assign different roles to separate individuals, but smaller teams often have fewer personnel, making it difficult to divide tasks while maintaining efficiency and security. 

One of the primary obstacles small contractors' faces is a limited IT staff. When there are only one or two IT professionals handling day-to-day operations, it becomes nearly impossible to separate key responsibilities such as access control, system administration, and security monitoring. These staff members are often required to wear multiple hats, which increases the risk of conflicts of interest, unintentional errors, and even insider threats. 

Role overlap is another common issue. In a small team, the same person might be responsible for managing both system updates and monitoring privileged user activity. This overlap can lead to a lack of accountability and the potential for security incidents to go unnoticed, as there is no independent party to review or approve actions taken by key personnel. 

In addition to staffing challenges, budget constraints further complicate the ability to implement proper SoD. Hiring additional staff to manage vital roles is often not feasible for small contractors, especially those working with limited financial resources. However, failing to address SoD requirements can lead to compliance issues with regulations like the CMMC and DFARS, which could result in penalties or loss of contracts. 

Fortunately, small contractors can overcome these challenges by leveraging outsourcing. By outsourcing critical functions such as security monitoring, access control management, and incident response to Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) like MAD Security, businesses can ensure proper Separation of Duties without the need to hire additional staff. MSSPs bring expert resources to monitor and manage security 24/7, reducing the risk of insider threats and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, all while helping contractors stay within budget. This approach provides small businesses with the necessary expertise and oversight to maintain a strong security posture. 

How to Implement Separation of Duties with Limited Resources 

For small contractors, implementing SoD can feel like an overwhelming challenge, especially with limited IT resources. However, there are effective strategies to ensure SoD is properly implemented without needing to expand your team significantly. By following a clear, step-by-step guide, small contractors can enhance their security posture, meet CMMC and DFARS compliance requirements, and protect sensitive data. 

Step 1: Identify Vital Roles 

The first step in implementing SoD is to identify the most essential roles and sensitive areas within your organization. These include tasks like access management, which governs who has access to your systems, log review to track actions within your systems, and system updates that can directly impact security. By identifying these key functions, small contractors can determine where SoD is most needed to reduce risks, such as unauthorized access or changes that could compromise security. 

Step 2: Assign Oversight 

Even with limited staff, it’s essential to assign oversight for vital actions. For example, if one individual is responsible for system administration, another person (even if it’s the same team member acting in a different capacity) should be tasked with reviewing or approving key actions such as system updates or access changes. This simple layer of oversight can reduce the risk of insider threats and ensure accountability. If the same person must perform both tasks, ensure that an independent review or external audit is scheduled regularly. 

Step 3: Automate Monitoring 

With limited resources, automation can be a game-changer for maintaining SoD. By leveraging monitoring and logging tools, contractors can automate the oversight of privileged user actions, access controls, and log configurations. Tools like SIEM or PAM solutions can track and record actions, alerting your team to suspicious activity without the need for continuous manual review. Automation reduces human error and ensures that security events are logged and monitored 24/7. 

Step 4: Outsource Key Tasks 

When internal resources are insufficient, consider outsourcing certain functions to an MSSP. Services like log management, incident response, and security monitoring can be handled by MSSPs, ensuring that SoD is maintained without requiring additional in-house staff. Outsourcing allows small contractors to benefit from expert-level security without the overhead of hiring a full-time team. 

Best Practices for Balancing Responsibilities 

In small teams, it’s important to rotate responsibilities where possible. By cross-training employees to handle various tasks, contractors can distribute duties, ensuring that no one individual maintains control over multiple sensitive areas for an extended period. Additionally, maintain clear documentation of roles and responsibilities to prevent confusion and ensure smooth transitions when employees rotate between tasks. 

By following these steps, small contractors can implement effective SoD, maintain compliance, and reduce risks—even with limited resources. 

Best Practices for Managing Privileged Users 

In small organizations, privileged users—those with elevated access to systems and sensitive data—pose the highest security risks. Whether intentional or accidental, privileged users can easily make changes that affect the security and integrity of a company’s IT infrastructure. This makes it essential for small contractors to implement strict controls over privileged accounts to mitigate insider threats and prevent unauthorized activities, especially to meet compliance with frameworks like CMMC, DFARS, and NIST. 

1. Prevent Privileged Users from Changing Logging Configurations 

One of the most essential practices in managing privileged users is to ensure they cannot alter or disable logging configurations. Logs are vital for tracking actions within your systems, and if a privileged user has the ability to change or erase logs, they could potentially cover their tracks after making unauthorized changes. To mitigate this risk, logging configurations should be managed separately, and access should be restricted to only a few select individuals who do not have day-to-day system administration duties. 

2. Implement Dual Control Mechanisms 

To further protect your systems, it’s important to implement dual control mechanisms. This means that any action taken by a privileged user—such as system updates, access changes, or significant configuration modifications—must require approval from another individual. Even in small teams, this dual control creates a check-and-balance system, ensuring that no one person can single-handedly carry out high-risk actions without oversight. These mechanisms can be automated with privileged access management (PAM) tools that enforce approval workflows. 

3. Conduct Regular Audits of Privileged Account Activities 

Routine audits are another practice for managing privileged users. By regularly auditing the activities of privileged accounts, small contractors can ensure that any unusual or unauthorized behavior is quickly identified and addressed. Audits should focus on login attempts, changes to system settings, and any modifications to access controls. Automated tools can simplify this process by flagging suspicious activities for review, ensuring privileged users remain accountable. 

By implementing these best practices, small contractors can significantly reduce the risks associated with privileged users, safeguard sensitive data, and stay compliant with industry regulations. 

Why Separation of Duties is Essential
for CMMC Compliance 

SoD is a fundamental principle in cybersecurity that plays an essential role in protecting businesses from insider threats, fraud, and errors. By ensuring that no single individual has full control over processes, SoD minimizes the risk of unauthorized access or actions going unnoticed. This is especially important for contractors working within the Defense Industrial Base, as failing to implement proper SoD can lead to serious security breaches and non-compliance with the CMMC framework. 

Risk Mitigation Through SoD 

One of the primary benefits of SoD is its ability to mitigate risks associated with insider threats and unintentional errors. Without proper checks and balances, a single individual could potentially make changes to systems, access sensitive data, or alter security settings without oversight. This creates significant vulnerabilities, as it opens the door to both malicious actions and accidental mistakes that could compromise sensitive information, such as Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). By dividing duties, SoD ensures that risky actions require review and approval, reducing the chance of unauthorized activities. 

Error Prevention and Accountability 

Another essential advantage of SoD is its role in preventing errors and ensuring accountability. When multiple individuals are involved in sensitive tasks—such as system updates, access management, and security monitoring—the likelihood of mistakes is greatly reduced. SoD creates a system where one person's actions are reviewed and validated by another, ensuring that potential errors are caught before they impact the organization. This not only strengthens security but also promotes accountability, as employees know their actions are subject to oversight. 

CMMC Requirements and Compliance 

For contractors subject to CMMC compliance, SoD is not just a best practice; it’s a requirement. The CMMC framework mandates the implementation of SoD to safeguard CUI and ensure that sensitive information is protected from both internal and external threats. Failure to maintain proper SoD can result in severe consequences, including financial penalties, loss of contracts, or even legal action. Non-compliance with CMMC can jeopardize an organization’s ability to win and maintain defense contracts, making SoD a vital aspect of a contractor's overall cybersecurity strategy. 

Implementing SoD is essential for small contractors aiming to mitigate risks, prevent errors, and maintain CMMC compliance, ensuring the protection of sensitive information and the continuity of business operations. 

How MAD Security Can Help Small Contractors Implement Separation of Duties 

For small contractors in the defense industry, maintaining SoD is not only essential for security but also essential for meeting CMMC compliance requirements. At MAD Security, we specialize in helping small contractors effectively implement SoD, even with limited IT staff, ensuring they meet the rigorous standards required to protect CUI. 

With extensive experience supporting contractors in the defense sector, MAD Security provides tailored solutions that simplify the complexities of cybersecurity and compliance. Our SOC as a Service (SOCaaS) and Virtual Compliance Management (VCM) services are specifically designed to help small businesses maintain proper SoD without the need for a large, in-house IT team. By outsourcing important security functions like monitoring, incident response, and compliance management to MAD Security, small contractors can ensure that their most sensitive duties are effectively separated and managed. 

MAD Security takes a comprehensive approach to SoD, customized to the unique needs of small contractors. Through our "Completely MAD Security Process," we assess each client’s specific requirements, identifying potential gaps in their SoD practices and providing solutions that enhance security and compliance. Our services help contractors reduce the risk of insider threats, errors, and non-compliance, all while staying within their budget constraints. 

By partnering with MAD Security, small contractors gain access to expert-level security solutions that ensure proper SoD, helping them stay compliant with CMMC and protect their business from evolving cybersecurity threats. 

Prioritize Separation of Duties
to Secure Your Business 

Separation of Duties is a critical practice for businesses of all sizes, particularly small contractors handling sensitive data. Proper SoD helps mitigate the risks of insider threats, fraud, and human error by ensuring that no single individual has unchecked control over key processes. For small contractors, neglecting SoD can result in compliance failures, security breaches, and even the loss of contracts—especially when dealing with requirements like CMMC and DFARS. 

Even with limited IT staff, small organizations must take SoD seriously to protect their operations and maintain compliance. By outsourcing key functions, implementing oversight measures, and utilizing expert support, small contractors can effectively manage SoD without overwhelming their resources. 

It’s time to evaluate your current SoD practices. Contact MAD Security for expert guidance and tailored solutions that will keep your business secure and compliant while minimizing the burden on your internal team. 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQS)